On EX4300 Series switches with TCAM optimization enabled, incoming multicast traffic matches an implicit loopback filter rule first, since it has high priority. This rule is meant for reserved multicast addresses 224.0.0.x, but incorrectly matches on 224.x.x.x. Due to this bug, w
On EX4300 Series switches with TCAM optimization enabled, incoming multicast traffic matches an implicit loopback filter rule first, since it has high priority. This rule is meant for reserved multicast addresses 224.0.0.x, but incorrectly matches on 224.x.x.x. Due to this bug, when a firewall filter is applied on the loopback interface, other firewall filters might stop working for multicast…
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Juniper Networks | Junos OS | 14.1X53 versions prior to 14.1X53-D51 and 14.1X53-D115 on EX4300 Series, 17.1 versions prior to 17.1R3 on EX4300 Series, 17.2 versions prior to 17.2R3-S2 on EX4300 Series, 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R3-S3 on EX4300 Series, 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2-S5 and 17.4R3 on EX4300 Series, 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S1 on EX4300 Series, 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R2 on EX4300 Series, 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R2 on EX4300 Series |
Not currently listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. EPSS is the best forward-looking signal — see the EPSS row above.
For the full vendor write-up, exploit chains, and reference implementations, see the references list in section 09.
Open the Sigma generator with a pre-filled prompt for this CVE to draft a starting detection in your stack of choice:
No directly-cited follow-up CVEs in the KB record for this advisory. The references list in section 09 carries the vendor cross-references.