CVE-2019-9861 — Due to the use of an insecure RFID technology (MIFARE Classic), ABUS proximity c

Due to the use of an insecure RFID technology (MIFARE Classic), ABUS proximity chip keys (RFID tokens) of the ABUS Secvest FUAA50000 wireless alarm system can easily be cloned and used to deactivate the alarm system in an unauthorized way.

01What is this vulnerability?

Due to the use of an insecure RFID technology (MIFARE Classic), ABUS proximity chip keys (RFID tokens) of the ABUS Secvest FUAA50000 wireless alarm system can easily be cloned and used to deactivate the alarm system in an unauthorized way.

02Affected products

Vendor	Product	Versions
n	a / n/a	n/a

03Active exploitation status

Not currently listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. EPSS is the best forward-looking signal — see the EPSS row above.

04Recommended remediation

• Patch to a fixed version listed in the vendor advisory (see references below).
• Mitigate with WAF rules, network egress filters, or feature flags where the patch is not yet available.
• Hunt historical logs for exploitation indicators — see Detection signatures below.

05Technical details

For the full vendor write-up, exploit chains, and reference implementations, see the references list in section 09.

06Detection signatures

Ask SARA in chat to draft a starting detection for this CVE in your stack of choice.

07Related CVEs

No directly-cited follow-up CVEs in the KB record for this advisory. The references list in section 09 carries the vendor cross-references.

08Timeline

• Published: 2019-05-14T16:03:38.000Z
• Last modified: 2024-08-04T22:01:55.030Z

09References

• www.syss.de — https://www.syss.de/fileadmin/dokumente/Publikationen/Advisories/SYSS-2019-005.t…
• seclists.org — https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/May/1
• packetstormsecurity.com — http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152714/ABUS-Secvest-3.01.01-Cryptographic-I…
• seclists.org — http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/May/3